1. Trump from Michael_Novakhov (197 sites): “Trump anxiety” – Google News: The Left Lets Trumpism Rule the World – The New York Times

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

The Left Lets Trumpism Rule the World  The New York Times

More than 600 million Indians cast their ballots over the past six weeks in the largest democratic election in the world. Donald Trump won. A week ago, several …

“Trump anxiety” – Google News

1. Trump from Michael_Novakhov (197 sites)


Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

1. Trump from Michael_Novakhov (197 sites): Lawfare – Hard National Security Choices: The Assange Indictment Seeks to Punish Pure Publication

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

There is a lot to digest in the superseding indictment of Julian Assange, which charges the Wikileaks founder with 17 counts under the 1917 Espionage Act in connection with the Chelsea Manning disclosures. But three of those counts represent a profoundly troubling legal theory, one rarely contemplated and never successfully deployed. Under those counts, the Justice Department now seeks to punish the pure act of publication of newsworthy government secrets under the nation’s spying laws.

The 17 Espionage Act charges in the indictment can be grouped in three categories. The first category includes just count one, a conspiracy charge under § 793(g) of the Espionage Act.

The second category includes counts two through 14. Those look similar to the only other case involving a non-governmental third party charged under the Espionage Act: the unsuccessful prosecution of two employees at the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) for allegedly conspiring with a Pentagon analyst to receive and disseminate information about Iran. In that case, the government charged one AIPAC employee, Steven Rosen, with aiding and abetting the analyst’s disclosures under both the Espionage Act and 18 U.S.C § 2, the federal statute that permits someone who induces or causes another to commit a crime to be punished just like the offender. The Assange charges do the same but go further than the § 2 claim in the Rosen case. They allege that Assange “aided, abetted, counseled, induced, procured and willfully caused” Manning to leak the documents in violation of the Espionage Act (emphasis added).

But it’s the third category—counts 15 through 17—that gets at pure publication. These counts focus only on Assange’s having posted the documents on the internet and do not depend on some other action, such as encouraging the leak or receiving the information. Of course, those are also activities similar to newsgathering, which should also receive First Amendment protection . But counts 15 through 17 are totally divorced from any concerted action between Assange and Manning. The theory behind them would permit prosecution even if Assange had received the material anonymously in the mail.

Those counts allege that Assange directly violated the Espionage Act when he “communicated” significant activity, SIGACT, reports from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and State Department cables, “by publishing [the documents] on the internet.” In other words, counts 15 through 17 allege a direct violation of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) based purely on publication.

The superseding indictment emphasizes that the published material included the “names of individuals, who risked their safety and freedom by providing information to the United States and our allies.” Practically and ethically, this is an important distinction between Assange and news outlets that wrote stories based on the leaked SIGACT reports and cables. The New York Times, for instance, removed the names of informants and, at the request of the government, asked Assange to do the same. Assange’s decision to include the names should not be minimized.

Legally, however, there is nothing in the text of the Espionage Act that turns on the publication of the names of informants. Even if news organizations protect the identity of informants when publishing classified information, prosecutors can claim some other serious national security harm to justify an Espionage Act case. As a legal matter, the publication of informants’ names won’t serve to distinguish this case from a future Espionage Act prosecution based on pure publication.

Additionally, without discounting the potential for harm to U.S. informants, it is noteworthy that the documents published here were classified up to the level of “secret,” not “top secret,” and did not involve some of the most sensitive government programs (such as signals intelligence or specific war plans). Not that it should, but the government has never brought an Espionage Act claim based just on the publication of signals intelligence information, which is considered much more sensitive than State Department cable traffic, despite opportunities to do so.

That the government forbore from acting against the press in recent cases involving leaks of signals intelligence material, but is bringing a case to criminalize the disclosures here, is striking. Again, the point here is not that the government should bring cases against news organizations who report on the NSA, quite the opposite.  Rather, one would expect that, at the very least, the Justice Department would reserve an Espionage Act case based solely on publication for the gravest risks to national security.  It does not appear to have done so here.

Instances where the government has even contemplated a pure publication theory are exceedingly rare. Even the Pentagon Papers case was an attempt to stop but not punish publication (though Washington Post reporter Ben Bagdikian and possibly others were investigated for violations of the Espionage Act). In each case we know of where the government considered action to punish the publication of government secrets, the prosecution ultimately did not proceed. For instance, the Franklin Roosevelt administration’s efforts to indict a war reporter and the Chicago Tribune for a story that officials feared could alert the Japanese to the compromise of their naval codes fell apart after the Navy refused to permit cryptanalysts to testify before the grand jury. Two others, involving submarine-based surveillance programs against the Soviets, failed to proceed in part because of First Amendment concerns.

The trend even among this handful of cases is clear. The government has come up to the line of prosecuting the press for publishing government secrets, but invariably something walks it back from the brink. Counts 15 through 17 of the superseding Assange indictment represent the first time a grand jury has issued an indictment based on a pure publication theory. This goes beyond just a threat to sources or newsgathering; it’s a direct threat to news reporting.

Many may criticize Assange, but First Amendment protections for the publication of newsworthy information are as essential as they have ever been. An ongoing case from Northern Ireland starkly illustrates the importance of those safeguards.

The Reporters Committee, where I work, intervened with twenty news organizations in a Belfast court to support a challenge to police raids targeting two filmmakers of the American-Irish documentary “No Stone Unturned.” Directed by Oscar-winner Alex Gibney, the film explored the investigation into an atrocity from the Troubles, the Loughinisland massacre. In 1994, loyalist paramilitary members opened fire in a pub in the small Northern Irish town of Loughinisland. Because the Republic of Ireland was playing Italy in the World Cup, the gunmen believed the crowd would be mostly Catholic. Six people were killed and five were injured. No one has ever been charged.

The police have been dogged by accusations that they colluded with the paramilitaries, and that authorities sabotaged the investigation into the massacre to protect paramilitary informants. In 2011, a police ombudsperson report named the likely suspects in the case. That report was leaked anonymously to one of the filmmakers, and the film names the suspects. In 2018, a year after the film debuted at the New York Film Festival, as many as a hundred officers from British and Northern Irish police forces raided both filmmakers’ homes, seizing their work product and newsgathering equipment. Both were told they may have violated the Official Secrets Act, which has been used against the press repeatedly in the United Kingdom. The Belfast court will hear arguments in the case next week.

The “No Stone Unturned” case starkly shows the need for First Amendment protections for the publication of government information in the public interest. The British Official Secrets Act permits the direct investigation and prosecution of journalists for publishing official secrets, something that has been historically anathema under the First Amendment. These three counts in the superseding Assange indictment threaten to bring the U.S. closer to an Official Secrets Act of its own.

Lawfare – Hard National Security Choices

1. Trump from Michael_Novakhov (197 sites)


Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

#DonaldTrump, the #NewAbwehrHypothesis might be #THEEXPLANATION, and you might be #completely #unwitting. My #Sincere & #Honest #Advice: Accept, embrace, and assist the ongoing #investigations… – M.N.

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from The FBI News Review.

Representative #JerryNadler: #RobertMueller Wants To #Testify In Private … youtu.be/_Z-py5VlcOk via @YouTube #FBI #CIA #ODNI #TrumpInvestigations #TrumpProbe #Congress #Senate #MuellerReport #FullMuellerReport #JudiciaryCommittee #NewAbwehr #InvestigateTheInvestigators! #NIC 

1 Share
Representative #JerryNadler: #RobertMueller Wants To #Testify In Private … youtu.be/_Z-py5VlcOk via @YouTube
#FBI #CIA #ODNI #TrumpInvestigations #TrumpProbe #Congress #Senate #MuellerReport #FullMuellerReport #JudiciaryCommittee #NewAbwehr #InvestigateTheInvestigators! #NIC

Posted by  mikenov on Friday, May 24th, 2019 9:05am

#DonaldTrump, the #NewAbwehrHypothesis might be #THEEXPLANATION, and you might be #completely #unwitting. My #Sincere & #Honest #Advice: Accept, embrace, and assist the ongoing #investigations… – M.N. trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/406-pm… #FBI #CIA #ODNI #CI #Counterintelligence #TrumpProbe pic.twitter.com/aJTruV2tyl 

1 Share
#DonaldTrump, the #NewAbwehrHypothesis might be #THEEXPLANATION, and you might be #completely #unwitting. My #Sincere & #Honest #Advice: Accept, embrace, and assist the ongoing #investigations… – M.N.
trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/406-pm…
#FBI #CIA #ODNI #CI #Counterintelligence #TrumpProbe pic.twitter.com/aJTruV2tyl

Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 8:12pm

The #TrumpInvestigations #Blog by #MichaelNovakhov – #Review Of #News And #Opinions: 3:26 PM 5/23/2019 – No one but the #NewAbwehr would be able to pull off these #IntelligenceOperations: #TrumpElections2016, 9/11, and many, many others… trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/326-pm… #FBI #CIA #ODNI pic.twitter.com/TRKmnW7FI8 

1 Share
The #TrumpInvestigations #Blog by #MichaelNovakhov – #Review Of #News And #Opinions: 3:26 PM 5/23/2019 – No one but the #NewAbwehr would be able to pull off these #IntelligenceOperations: #TrumpElections2016, 9/11, and many, many others…
trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/326-pm…
#FBI #CIA #ODNI pic.twitter.com/TRKmnW7FI8


Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 7:34pm

Pelosi Openly Questions Trump’s Fitness for Office, Suggests Family or Staff ‘Intervention’ on.ktla.com/ATQJ9 via @ktla

1 Share
Pelosi Openly Questions Trump’s Fitness for Office, Suggests Family or Staff ‘Intervention’ on.ktla.com/ATQJ9 via @ktla

Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 5:49pm

#ErnstUhrlau, DID YOU #SUPERVISE #TRUMPKUSHNERACCOUNTS AT #DEUTSCHEBANK? #Yes or #No? #VeryStrange if “No” in your #capacity as “#Consultant on #GeopoliticalRisks” fbireform.com/2019/05/23/121… #FBI #CIA #ODNI #TrumpInvestigations #TrumpProbe #News #Revelations #Counterintelligence #CI pic.twitter.com/D02Pvqhoj2 

1 Share
#ErnstUhrlau, DID YOU #SUPERVISE #TRUMPKUSHNERACCOUNTS AT #DEUTSCHEBANK? #Yes or #No? #VeryStrange if “No” in your #capacity as “#Consultant on #GeopoliticalRisks”
fbireform.com/2019/05/23/121…
#FBI #CIA #ODNI #TrumpInvestigations #TrumpProbe #News #Revelations #Counterintelligence #CI pic.twitter.com/D02Pvqhoj2


Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 4:16pm
Read the whole story

 

· ·

#ErnstUhrlau, DID YOU #SUPERVISE THE #TRUMPKUSHNERACCOUNTS AT #DEUTSCHEBANK? #Yes or #No? It would be #VeryStrange if you didn’t, in your #capacity as the “#Consultant on #GeopoliticalRisks”. #Huge #risks, indeed. #Now we #see them. #TrumpInvestigations #InvestigateNewAbwehr #CI pic.twitter.com/tvAZyGccPg

1 Share
#ErnstUhrlau, DID YOU #SUPERVISE THE #TRUMPKUSHNERACCOUNTS AT #DEUTSCHEBANK? #Yes or #No? It would be #VeryStrange if you didn’t, in your #capacity as the “#Consultant on #GeopoliticalRisks”. #Huge #risks, indeed. #Now we #see them.
#TrumpInvestigations #InvestigateNewAbwehr #CI pic.twitter.com/tvAZyGccPg


Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 3:50pm
Next Page of Stories
Loading…
Page 2

M.N. – In my #Opinion: Herr #ErnstUhrlau might #claim that he “#cannotremember”. #We can #treat this untimely and unlikely, although very convenient early #amnesia… trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/mn-in-… #FBI #CIA #ODNI #InvestigateTrump! #InvestigateNewAbwehr! #InvestigateFBI! #Truth #SaveUS pic.twitter.com/mmc7XK9Jch

1 Share
M.N. – In my #Opinion: Herr #ErnstUhrlau might #claim that he “#cannotremember”. #We can #treat this untimely and unlikely, although very convenient early #amnesia…
trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/mn-in-…
#FBI #CIA #ODNI #InvestigateTrump! #InvestigateNewAbwehr! #InvestigateFBI! #Truth #SaveUS pic.twitter.com/mmc7XK9Jch


Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 3:29pm

The #TrumpInvestigations #Blog by #MichaelNovakhov – #Review Of #News #And #Opinions: #Panel, #Justice #strike #deal on #Mueller #report – 9:2… trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/panel-… #FBI #CIA #ODNI #CI #Congress #Senate #IntelligenceServices #Counterintelligence #FullMuellerReport #ProbeFBI! pic.twitter.com/sF6ASaxqoH 

1 Share
The #TrumpInvestigations #Blog by #MichaelNovakhov – #Review Of #News #And #Opinions: #Panel, #Justice #strike #deal on #Mueller #report – 9:2… trumpinvestigations.blogspot.com/2019/05/panel-…
#FBI #CIA #ODNI #CI #Congress #Senate #IntelligenceServices #Counterintelligence #FullMuellerReport #ProbeFBI! pic.twitter.com/sF6ASaxqoH



Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 1:31pm
Read the whole story

 

· · ·

#Schroeder #controls #Gazprom and #Rosneft and therefore he, and the #GermanSocialDemocracy, led and equipped by the #NewAbwehr, #control #Russia herself, and not the other way around as #Trump claimed (that “#RussiacontrolsGermany”.) trumpandtrumpism.com/2019/05/23/325… #FBI #CIA #ODNI #NSC pic.twitter.com/pMWdNxvKb8 

1 Share
#Schroeder #controls #Gazprom and #Rosneft and therefore he, and the #GermanSocialDemocracy, led and equipped by the #NewAbwehr, #control #Russia herself, and not the other way around as #Trump claimed (that “#RussiacontrolsGermany”.)
trumpandtrumpism.com/2019/05/23/325…
#FBI #CIA #ODNI #NSC pic.twitter.com/pMWdNxvKb8


Posted by  mikenov on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 7:51am

RT @thehill: Poll: Strong majority of voters say President Trump does not deserve a second term in office hill.cm/XFGjoWW https://t… 

1 Share
Poll: Strong majority of voters say President Trump does not deserve a second term in office hill.cm/XFGjoWW pic.twitter.com/Hp3hV0N97k


Posted by  thehill on Wednesday, May 22nd, 2019 10:22pm
Retweeted by  mikenov on Wednesday, May 22nd, 2019 10:31pm

698 likes, 190 retweets

Read the whole story

 

· ·

#Hoyer: #Trump #conducting #largest #cover-up in #history of the #UnitedStates washex.am/2WpnTGJ 

1 Share
#Hoyer: #Trump #conducting #largest #cover-up in #history of the #UnitedStates washex.am/2WpnTGJ

Posted by  mikenov on Wednesday, May 22nd, 2019 3:03pm

Report: #RussianMob #money helped build #Trump #business #empire A stunning #report in The @newrepublic alleges that, whether @realDonaldTrump knew it or not, for #decades he made a #large #portion of his #personalfortune from #Russianmobsters &… msnbc.com/brian-williams… #FBI #CI

1 Share
Report: #RussianMob #money helped build #Trump #business #empire

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

Representative #JerryNadler: #RobertMueller Wants To #Testify In Private … youtu.be/_Z-py5VlcOk via @YouTube #FBI #CIA #ODNI #TrumpInvestigations #TrumpProbe #Congress #Senate #MuellerReport #FullMuellerReport #JudiciaryCommittee #NewAbwehr #InvestigateTheInvestigators! #NIC

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from mikenov on Twitter.

Representative #JerryNadler: #RobertMueller Wants To #Testify In Private … youtu.be/_Z-py5VlcOk via @YouTube
#FBI #CIA #ODNI #TrumpInvestigations #TrumpProbe #Congress #Senate #MuellerReport #FullMuellerReport #JudiciaryCommittee #NewAbwehr #InvestigateTheInvestigators! #NIC


Posted by

mikenov
on Friday, May 24th, 2019 9:05am

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

Barr Got More Power to Review the Russia Inquiry. Here’s What We Know About Its Origins. – The New York Times

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares


Michael_Novakhov
shared this story
from “barr to investigate fbi” – Google News.

Barr Got More Power to Review the Russia Inquiry. Here’s What We Know About Its Origins.  The New York Times

The attorney general has the power to declassify intelligence agencies’ secrets as he examines the investigation into Russia’s election interference and ties to …


Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

Barr Got More Power to Review the Russia Inquiry. Here’s What We Know About Its Origins. – The New York Times

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

Barr Got More Power to Review the Russia Inquiry. Here’s What We Know About Its Origins.  The New York Times

The attorney general has the power to declassify intelligence agencies’ secrets as he examines the investigation into Russia’s election interference and ties to …


Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

Barr Got More Power to Review the Russia Inquiry. Here’s What We Know About Its Origins. – The New York Times

Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares

Barr Got More Power to Review the Russia Inquiry. Here’s What We Know About Its Origins.  The New York Times

The attorney general has the power to declassify intelligence agencies’ secrets as he examines the investigation into Russia’s election interference and ties to …


Share this article
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    3
    Shares